Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Overcoming Bias gets the gist right:

http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/11/its-news-on-academia-n...

The links from that post are other reasonably unemotional commentaries.



From the article

> If you don’t like this state of affairs join me in trying to develop a more reliable consensus mechanism on such topics: prediction markets.

It would be great if people were rewarded or punished based on the eventual utility and correctness of their statements rather than their immediate appeal. In a sense people are using their reputation as a currency in a prediction market of sorts just by recording their thoughts and opinions publicly. In the future this information should be easy to aggregate. You could imagine a public 'credibility score' much like a credit score. In this current debate it seems there will be substantial loss of reputation for those you nail their colours to the wrong mast.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: