Your argument would be more valid when comparing for example the PPC32 to PPC64,... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		vetinari on Oct 29, 2009 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala released Your argument would be more valid when comparing for example the PPC32 to PPC64, but for IA32 vs AMD64 you are missing: - IA32 is register starved ISA, AMD64 is not. It has doubled the amount of general registers. - AMD64 doesn't have to support the x87 FPU baggage. As a result, it is simpler to deal with fp math.

pyre on Oct 30, 2009 [–]

IIRC AMD64 does support x87, but Window/Linux have chosen to 'standardize' on SSE. In this respect x86-64 is a 'version' of x86 where all processors are guaranteed to have SSE and not need x87.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact