> Not being able to tell somebody you need a lawyer is very different from not having court records published until later. It is disingenuous to imply they are the same.
Where in any of those gag orders was Levison forbidden from obtaining an attorney, or telling people he was retaining an attorney?
If you can't tell your attorney why you need him and under what conditions the case will be prosecuted, then you don't have representation. You have instead, a repressive feudal system of serfhood.
Where in any of those gag orders was Levison forbidden from obtaining an attorney, or telling people he was retaining an attorney?