Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> In my opinion types are a poor man's schema

What's the distinction you're drawing here?

> my email is not a string, it's a email, and my longitude/latitude pair are not just ints they have specific ranges, saying that longitude is 500 is as wrong as saying it's "foo"

I fully agree. Those sound like exactly the kind of thing I would enforce using types.

> and this only in the places I need, no need to a schematize or assert every simple function with obvious parameters.

How do you enforce that all code paths go via your schema? Just visual inspection?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: