Amazing how out-of-whack headlines are from the article copy even on sites like ATD. This is from the article:
> As a result, if Twitter continues to grow into the de facto public social network, it could easily start taking millions (and perhaps billions) of valuable ad dollars from YouTube.
So "could" in the copy changes to "is going to" in the headline, while "millions (and perhaps billions)" changes to "a billion dollars".
I'm guessing the headline writer knew something the writer didn't. I wish there were a way for me to take back my pageviews from sites with wilfully misleading headlines like these.
> As a result, if Twitter continues to grow into the de facto public social network, it could easily start taking millions (and perhaps billions) of valuable ad dollars from YouTube.
So "could" in the copy changes to "is going to" in the headline, while "millions (and perhaps billions)" changes to "a billion dollars".
I'm guessing the headline writer knew something the writer didn't. I wish there were a way for me to take back my pageviews from sites with wilfully misleading headlines like these.