Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't disagree entirely, but there is a pretty strong hint of the self-aware dry humour typical of Australians. I think he believes what he's saying, but they're probably not taking themselves that seriously or literally.


I am talking about people, not politics. Unless you think individual Australians, are well known for their personal authoritarianism?

I don't find myself conducting much authoritarianism but admittedly I do keep a pretty tight grip on the movements of my budgies. It's for their own good you see.


As a prominent sporter of budgie smugglers myself, yes, I do in fact think that Australian identity involves a great deal of authoritarianism. Its how the country was built, after all.


I will genuinely think this through, as I had never considered it could be part of a collective identity. I think in general Australians are quite disconnected from politics. Complacency is likely how we ended up with our authoritarian leanings in politics, rather than Australians having a desire for a more authoritarian government. But I do live in a bit of a bubble, and I do know when isses of security come up Australians seem pretty happy to give the government more control.


Authoritarianism is not just a political ideology, it is also a psychological personality which can be triggered by a multitude of factors. Australians have had a century for this memetic mental virus to be inculcated into their society - the easiest way to see this is to leave, learn another language, and then come back...


>humour

The word you should have used is authoritarianism, which this writer has, alas, in spades.

Your users are more important than your sense of self worth, in this industry.

Nobody ships ego. We ship working software: to users who find it valuable.


> We ship working software: to users who find it valuable.

I agree that's what's most likely to bring you financial and reputational success, but I also think there are a lot of things people can and do sell that are various incarnations of snake oil, at best.

This perhaps gets a little philosophical, but: is it ethical to sell someone something they don't need, and doesn't actually help them, even if they believe they need it, and over time even believe they've been helped by it?

I think a lot of the applications of "AI" today can fall under that umbrella, given the "right" customer.


> is it ethical to sell someone something they don't need

It would only be unethical to remove their agency over the decision, in my opinion.


Apologies, I posted my reply on the parent comment.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: