I haven't gone in detail on the draft, but what is nuts is that those are exempt, as well as everyone who uses a service not-for-profit.
So, if you self-host [1], you don't need to adhere to the legislation.
But, wait… Are you telling me that security officials are allowed to use not their self-hosted infrastructure, but use public one to send (I assume, based on their exemption) confidential data?
And, as @WA proposed, will be a list of contacts of these officials given to all for-profit organisations?
So, if you self-host [1], you don't need to adhere to the legislation.
But, wait… Are you telling me that security officials are allowed to use not their self-hosted infrastructure, but use public one to send (I assume, based on their exemption) confidential data?
And, as @WA proposed, will be a list of contacts of these officials given to all for-profit organisations?
What a stupid joke it is!
[1]: See third row at https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/posts/chat-control/#current... .