Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You are implying that advertisers would boycott a free speech platform, and this might be true for some advertisers, when Facebook was boycotted by some activist businesses it didn't dent their bottom line.

Also - Twitter is more of a networking and influence tool in my opinion for "important people". These people are MUCH more likely to pay for Twitter, it's not like facebook where 99% of people would never pay for it. Which I think is what Musk was hinting at with blue badges for $2.

If he does that, boycotting advertisers will matter much less.



How many "important people" do you think exist on Twitter? It's a few thousand, maybe tens of thousands at most.

So that revenue is worth, what, $50,000 a year?


How many people on twitter think they're important? That's the more pertinent question.


Advertisers didn’t boycott Facebook because Facebook ads are a money making machine. They demonstrably work because of the depth and breadth of Facebook’s data targeting. You can’t compare it to Twitter; advertisers may be more willing to dump Twitter as a platform as it isn’t as valuable.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: