>By scientific evidence, in the context of this paper, we refer to the advice of international authorities in infection control (including the World Health Organisation, (European) Centres for Disease Control and Prevention), and the body of peer-reviewed scientific papers.
Any further questions?
Advice of international authorities is taken as scientific evidence.
And now this piece of shit thinly veiled opinion piece gets echoed and propogated furher as "peer-reviewed scientific paper published in Nature" right here in this very thread.
No one is calling it a "peer-reviewed scientific paper published in Nature" in this thread. The only person who mentioned Nature in this thread did so exactly to point out that this paper isn't published in Nature but in another journal somehow associated with Nature.
Any further questions?
Advice of international authorities is taken as scientific evidence.
And now this piece of shit thinly veiled opinion piece gets echoed and propogated furher as "peer-reviewed scientific paper published in Nature" right here in this very thread.
It's beyond depressing.