No, you're asking me to not communicate to other security resarchers about the problems with security systems (for example, publishing a PoC):
> 2. People who create and distribute these stickers knowing their purpose should go to prison.
... and you're asking the entire world to change to make your vehicle work:
> 4. Roads should be modified over time to make it more difficult to do this attack.
10 years ago when AI cars were getting memed into existence I would get dogpiled on for naysaying. Now you same people want laws to stop people from breaking what was already easily breakable and which you argued was unbreakable.
Also, your poison analogy is invalid. Poison is not uncommon because of law, it's uncommon because it's uncommon. In the future, crazy people will be poisoning random stuff in the grocer because they don't like the demographic that shops there.
> 2. People who create and distribute these stickers knowing their purpose should go to prison.
... and you're asking the entire world to change to make your vehicle work:
> 4. Roads should be modified over time to make it more difficult to do this attack.
10 years ago when AI cars were getting memed into existence I would get dogpiled on for naysaying. Now you same people want laws to stop people from breaking what was already easily breakable and which you argued was unbreakable.
Also, your poison analogy is invalid. Poison is not uncommon because of law, it's uncommon because it's uncommon. In the future, crazy people will be poisoning random stuff in the grocer because they don't like the demographic that shops there.