Can we add a (2013)? This article is over 8 years out of date.

Is it not much more relevant today, than it was in 2013 though? At a minimum, the core thesis of the article stands.

This is unusually unbiased reporting.

No... apart from j, l, and ; it leans entirely to the left.

(of the keyboard)

This just forwards to homepage for me

Me too. And at the same time it sets a "non-us" cookie, so maybe it's some sort of geolocation silliness.

Anyway, here's an archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20211102003457/https://www.nbcne...

It didn't for me when I submitted it, now it does. I guess all the extra traffic caused them to fix it.

So many questions. Is this a widely-known thing in the NBC archives? If so, what was the original context and why has it been left up (the CMS entry is dated 2013)? If not, how did the submitter find it? I tried incrementing the URL and got 404s, so the path isn’t discoverable.

The oldest Wayback Machine Archive[1] is only from May of 2021, so not 2013 - perhaps some CMS default or something?

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20210521160510/https://www.nbcne...

sdf asdf asdfasdf asdfasdf asdfasdf asd fsdgfsdgf asdf asdf asdf

sadf asdlkfha lsdfklha skldfhakls hdflkjahsdfk lhakljsdfh ahsdfl kalksjdfh lkajsdhf lkjasdflk haslkdjfh nlkjasdfjahsdkfj haslkdfh lkasdf asdf asdf asdflkjh lksd asdlf asdklhflkashdf asd fasd flkasdhf lkasdf asdfsdfjas fdhasdfklasdlf slkhdf lsk sdf s asdfa sa sdfasd asdf asdf asdf asdfasdf sadasd fsdaadsf asdf asdf fasdf a asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asdf asd

Sept. 4, 2013, 9:00 PM EDT / Source: WNCN-TV

Nah, I still think it's more likely to be a cranberry than the republicans.

Funny thing is the ads still work.

I’m very curious how much ad revenue a gibberish article can bring in.

I'm mildly curious if it is in fact gibberish.

The truth is out there Scully.

The article has been there with that text since at least May.

Couldn't find what might've been reported on by the CBS affiliate on 4 Sep 2013 though.

Snow crash?