> You have to explicitly optimise the city for public transit. Quite a lot of European cities do that.
Even in those cities very few enjoy taking public transport - and would drive if they had free parking, didn’t have to pay tolls, didn’t think it was terrible for the environment, etc
This is not true, driving in european cities is stressful (narrow streets with irregular layout, high density of pedestrians/cyclists, not enough parking places). The public transit, when done right, is way more convenient.
> would drive if they had free parking, didn’t have to pay tolls, didn’t think it was terrible for the environment, etc
So basically your argument is that people would drive if it weren't terrible in every way? By that logic, people would eat plutonium... if only it were more available, tasted good, and didn't kill you.
That would still make things worse, because cars need roadspace. Getting rid of the road space for cars and making public transit good enough is a pretty good solution.
Do these cities simply have terrible private transit options?
I don’t know anyone who would prefer to take public transport except in cities with poor car infrastructure.
I do know lots of people who would rather walk or bike to work.