You can define inventions that way. But that does not mean that the patent proce... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		eru on Feb 18, 2011 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: The "Donald Duck as prior art" case You can define inventions that way. But that does not mean that the patent process requires something that fits your definition.

Semiapies on Feb 18, 2011 [–]

That would be much of my point in my first post, now wouldn't it?

eru on Feb 18, 2011 | [–]

Indeed.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact