I thought that Tesla engineers would have thought of this. Guess it’s hard to be an innovator and inevitably you will fuck up pretty majorly. With cars though these fuck ups are more significant than with phones.
In previous threads I've seen Tesla roasted for doing this; apparently most vehicles that use flash loggers like this make it a user replaceable module.
I know it's hard to include replaceable storage due to the vibrations etc. but hopefully the new Teslas will at least start using something like XFMEXPRESS for semi-permanent storage.
> Guess it’s hard to be an innovator and inevitably you will fuck up pretty majorly.
Or, alternatively, hire people who know what they're doing and take their advice? Flash wear isn't exactly an obscure issue, and it would certainly be on the radar of, say, Bosch (who make a lot of this stuff for the industry).
Right, but not something you might consider until your OTA updates makes your kernel go from 300MB to 1GB. How many car manufacturers do OTA updates? Still, it seems like an extreme oversight and shouldn’t have happened even in the most rushed conditions.
