I don't understand this comment. Could you unroll it for me?
After all, AMP is despised by the tech community — but ultimately still used by publishers because Google's more-or-less holding them to ransom.
Apple's not holding App Store developers to ransom with regards to apps that use Electron; rather, the use of private APIs always has been and always will be forbidden.
That people went all-in with a technology that depends on private APIs without properly vetting the underlying stack, or rather that the core developers of this technology knowingly make use of private APIs, isn't quite the same as Google's leverage over publishers via its monopolistic grip on the world's search and advertising businesses, surely.
One is a matter of technology, possibly of security, and the other is a more political discussion.
But if I'm missing an angle, I'm open to being let know!
After all, AMP is despised by the tech community — but ultimately still used by publishers because Google's more-or-less holding them to ransom.
Apple's not holding App Store developers to ransom with regards to apps that use Electron; rather, the use of private APIs always has been and always will be forbidden.
That people went all-in with a technology that depends on private APIs without properly vetting the underlying stack, or rather that the core developers of this technology knowingly make use of private APIs, isn't quite the same as Google's leverage over publishers via its monopolistic grip on the world's search and advertising businesses, surely.
One is a matter of technology, possibly of security, and the other is a more political discussion.
But if I'm missing an angle, I'm open to being let know!