Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Tesla’s Solar Roof website now includes a pricing estimator, which lists $42,500 as the total price for the average 2,000 square-foot home, with 10kW solar panels. It also lists $33,950 as the price after an $8,550 federal tax incentive. You can also enter your address and get an updated estimate that takes into account local costs and incentives, and add on any Powerwalls (with three as the default for a 2,000 square-foot roof).

$42k does not sound like the solar roof is cheaper than a traditional roof. What kind of roof are they comparing it to? A mini-mansion with terra-cotta shingles or asphalt shingles?

A quick google search and home advisor suggests it’s about half the price.



> What kind of roof are they comparing it to?

“2,000 ft² roof with 10kW solar - Concrete tile roof with add-on solar panels“ https://www.tesla.com/solarroof/design


I was right. Premium roof plus solar. The premium roof shows a pic of terra-cotta.

The title of the article misled me but the Tesla link clears it up. Thanks.


I wonder if they should just skip comparing it with a normal roof or normal roof + solar.

A Model 3 is way more expensive than the average ICE sedan; people buy it anyway.


They do similar TCO comparisons with their cars.

They estimate fuel savings and include tax incentives etc.

In both cases they're making a case that the upfront cost is less than it appears if the running costs are lower.


To what extent is their claim true?


You get to drive the Model 3.


Also easier to get rid of your Model 3 and recoup some money if you don’t like it. Not so with your roof


Cheaper than traditional roof plus solar.


> Cheaper than traditional roof plus solar.

I find that really hard to believe. A new roof runs between 5-10k, and a 3kw solar system can be had for ~5k + labor. Even if they are including a power wall in that price it's still pretty steep.

Edit: It looks like they are actually quoting a 10kw system with 3 power walls (~40kwH storage) included, which at that point sounds about right at $40k. Still far beyond the reach of anyone but the wealthy, but not necessarily a bad deal if you're in the market.


> new roof runs between 5-10k,

That is incredibly cheap if so. That would be a roof on a small barn around here.


If you shop around it's abundantly clear that the price of a new roof varies wildly. Some of it is materials. The guy offering 50 year warranty GAF super-premium install who spots loads of potential problems up front and factors them into the cost is going to run much higher. The guy who is just going to hire some rando non-english speaking guys from the 7-11 and toss on the cheapest possible materials without concern about the underlying structure is going to be like a 1/4 of that price.

$5-10k on a median sized single family home is the latter, especially if you're closer to the $5k mark. It is likely that you will have problems with the roof after it is installed, and the warranty is going to be garbage.


> The guy who is just going to hire some rando non-english speaking guys from the 7-11 and toss on the cheapest possible materials without concern about the underlying structure is going to be like a 1/4 of that price.

You’ve met my guy Serge! He’s actually quite good and I’ve used him on two different houses. He probably has twice the experience of the super premium guy in town.

It’s mostly nailing rocky tar sheets to wood, the guy who has done it a billion times (literally?) sometimes might be the better choice over the guy who bought into an exclusive contract with super premium company and went to their special school for the special product.


They might be good, they might not. It's a luck of the draw when you are hiring the guys just standing on the street corner the morning of the install.

Contractors that have their own dedicated install crews cost more, but are much more reliable.


> Who is going to hire some rando non-english speaking guys from the 7-11

You know you didn't have to put non-english speaking in there, right? Totally unnecessary and shows potential racial bias.

(I'm not perfect either, and it bugs me when I say stuff like that too.)


Rolling my eyes here, bud. You’re missing the forest for the non-PC tree.

I met someone who could have been described as a “non-English-speaking roofer.” (Not Latino, fwiw.) He says he was essentially enslaved by the guy running the contracting company, and he had no recourse as no one spoke his language.

That’s the real issue, not phrasing quibbles


I think a case could be made in some situations that if your employees don't speak English and you don't speak whatever language they speak, you may get poorer construction outcomes. Even if the employees are experiences and smart.


Seems pretty normal where I live. Shingles are like $1/square foot but the labor costs of course vary wildly depending on location.


My last house was a 1400sqft cape. Removal of 2 layers of shingles, building a cricket next to the chimney, new lead flashing around the chimney was $7k. I got quote from multiple contractors for roughly the same price. It really depends on the amount of roof.


Roofs in my area are 20k for 1200 sq ft. Asphalt shingles. I would love to live in an area where it’s 5-10k.


I paid 30000 euros for roofing for a house a little bigger than that. I would have danced naked on the streets for 20k.


That's rediculous, in what area?


Exactly how is that out of the reach of anyone but the wealthy?

Amortized over 30 years, it's barely over $110 per month and for most homes would bring the electric bill to near zero.


Assuming you'll be in the same house for 30 years is a big gamble. What if you need to move in 5 or 10 years? You're house value doesn't go up $40k when you put $40k tesla roof on top.

I would bet a tesla roof actually reduces your house value. Imagine the cost of any roof maintenance, or trying to find a roofer who can work on it without just doing more damage.


if you have to pay up front it’s way too hard. loans have interest.


It's hard, but not impossible. Your costs are higher than a traditional power company for 10 or 15 years until the panels are paid off, but then your costs are much lower than people with traditional grid hookup.

In terms of investment it doesn't beat the stock market, but you have the side benefit of killing the planet slightly less. You are also hedged against rate increases from your power company.


Labor is a significant part of the cost, both for a roof and for a solar installation. I assume only doing it once is one of the gains in cost-efficiency.


You could reshingle a roof for $3.50/sqft and it's not unheard of to get traditional solar installed at $1.50/W, ~$15,000 for a 10kw system.

$7000 + $15,000

Then you apply the federal credit after that.

This is for a grid-tie system, I don't think Tesla is pricing theirs with a powerwall here.

Edit: apparently they're pricing it with 2 powerwalls, still cheaper by a sizeable margin however.


I just put in a 12kw system. It was $32k before federal rebate, and it was the cheapest bid by 5 different contractors. Not sure where your getting $15k


Wow, that seems quite high. Panels are around $0.50/Wh. Add in another $2000 in materials and labor cost $24k!


FWIW. The panels are $0.86/wh each with a micro-inverter that runs ~$160 per panel and 32 panels. So, ~$5000 for inverters, ~$11k for panels, which brings you to ~$16k and your not even tied into the power of the house, or adding the mandatory shutoff, or the new meters, or the Emphase system that tracks by the minute power consumption and usage of each panel, etc etc. So lets call the rest $4k

Total of parts ~$20k. $12k for construction in the Seattle area seems fair for a complex electrical install that includes a 10 year install and 25 year system warranty.

I think like many things, the last mile of work is way more expensive then people realize. Solar is more than the panels themselves

Note: I could have used cheaper panels, but they take up more roof. I could have also saved money by skipping the per-panel micro-inverters, but then the system is more brittle and less efficient


I didn't realize micro inverters were so expensive. Thanks for explaining it.


Yes. Your math is spot on, and the costs are similar on the East Coast.


> Edit: apparently they're pricing it with 2 powerwalls, still cheaper by a sizeable margin however.

Their price comparison doesn’t include the powerwalls from what I can tell...


Traditional roof PLUS solar panels


50 year premium traditional roof plus solar panels.

Headline is about as misleading as could be.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: