Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Hackernews is skeptical of many things though, sometimes hard to filter through the noise.


I find in tech, being skeptical by default is usually a good thing - perhaps not if you're an entrepreneur, but certainly if you're a developer or engineer.


> perhaps not if you're an entrepreneur

It's an essential thing if you want to be a successful entrepreneur -- as long as you don't confuse skepticism with cynicism. Skepticism and optimism make a powerful combination.


Or an investor. It is interesting how often investors goals accidentally line up with early employees.


How so?


Because both end up eventual minority shareholders in the same company. The difference of course being one of magnitude and that the investors are likely more diversified.


The key is to look at evidence. Ignore drive by commenters who make a negative post with nothing to back it up.

Theranos and WeWork are two great examples of companies hated by HN because there's evidence supporting negative opinions.


It's interesting, a while back I searched early HN comments about Theranos' announcement and they were mostly glowing and positive.

Edit: here's the thread - not 100% positive but close: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6349349


What are some examples where HN is too skeptical? I find that it's a good filter to view "news"


The famous Dropbox comment?

HN is overly skeptical of startups that take something possible and simplify the UX. Although I can't think of a recent example.


What was the famous Dropbox comment? I'm out of the loop. Thx.


https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224

basically someone belittling Dropbox before it went on to be worth billions.


Going by the general sentiment in that thread, I'm sure there are better examples. There are a few people saying how or why they thought Dropbox wouldn't work, but overall the reception is very positive. By contrast, any mention of WeWork here causes an instant pile-on of quite impressive vehemence.

There are always going to be isolated nay-sayers for whatever reasons. When you get a near-consensus on HN that something's a PoS that's something that's worth bearing in mind.


Articles warning against buying bitcoins were highly upvoted for years, and bitcoin costs several thousand dollars now.


I was mining bitcoin in 2011. It was stupid then and stupid now. Sometimes a lotto ticket hits.


Did you ever end up managing to hold to any?


blockchain


If anything, HN is not skeptical enough about THAT.


Agreed! It has been coming around in recent years, surely helped by the fact that "blockchain for X" has never panned out. But it has taken a painfully long time.


It's be dumb not to be with the amount of crap, optimism, and snake oil shoveled at us




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: