> It's the "fitness evaluation expert" who is refusing to confirm or even retest the guy. And her scorn about "commercial purposes" rings particularly hollow given she is taking salary from a publicly-funded university.
I'm also amused by their NDA. It reminds me of the EULAs that try to forbid you from posting reviews or benchmarks or basically anything that might be informative.
I'm also amused by their NDA. It reminds me of the EULAs that try to forbid you from posting reviews or benchmarks or basically anything that might be informative.