Society rewards people who contribute to society with dollars.
Society, with its money, is voting that it doesn't really care about Zuck's slight immorality. It actually prefers that he sacrifices his friendships and breaks a few laws in order to provide them with what they want.
The price of perfect rigid morality is several billion dollars.
Money that comes from the public is a vote of confidence.
But Clinton was impeached by a political process where money was not the main issue.
The public as a whole seems to have been on Clinton's side, but the will of the public was not represented by the legal system.
Point being, Clinton makes more money giving speeches than he ever did sitting in the White House collecting a salary :p
I think the beauty of money being exchanged in a free market is that it really shows you what society cares about. But the Presidency is not decided by money, so it's a totally different system and the money theory is not applicable.
Society, with its money, is voting that it doesn't really care about Zuck's slight immorality. It actually prefers that he sacrifices his friendships and breaks a few laws in order to provide them with what they want.
The price of perfect rigid morality is several billion dollars.