My guess is that the plan was or is to demonstrate that a subscription model can fill mostly empty theatres, while providing theaters with more stable revenue than they currently experience.
From there, the question is what to price the subscription at. It could be that revenue sharing on $10/mo with a couple added restrictions (No opening weekends) will provide theatres with more than they're currently making.
From there, the question is what to price the subscription at. It could be that revenue sharing on $10/mo with a couple added restrictions (No opening weekends) will provide theatres with more than they're currently making.