> In conclusion, we can see that zapcc is always faster than both gcc and clang.
For testing his template-heavy library. A very small data set, and while templates are one of the problems when it comes to C++ compilation speed, it's certainly not the only one.
Let's see the differences when compiling Firefox or the whole KDE suite.
For testing his template-heavy library. A very small data set, and while templates are one of the problems when it comes to C++ compilation speed, it's certainly not the only one.
Let's see the differences when compiling Firefox or the whole KDE suite.