Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't see how it could be interpreted as a joke. I've given up Java because of its verbosity, but anything that reduces it is a win.


I chuckled at the function that takes an object as an argument and returns the same object as the result.

Yes, I know it throws an exception if it's null... but when your id function has side effects, it's a sign that your language is Just "not that great".


The id function in Java has no side effects...

  public <T> T id(T t) {
    return t;
  } 
That's an id function. It works fine with nulls.

Where did anyone say that java.util.Objects was providing an id function anyway?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: