Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If you don't mind me asking, how does your absolute salary fare when moving to a lower cost of living region? Do employers tend to keep you at the salary you had, or does it take a hit (even though it is supposedly "equivalent" in some sense)?


My base salary went up slightly, and my total compensation went down. We'll see how the options turn out.


How did total comp went down if base went up? What was it that went down specifically?


Outside of a few hot areas, total compensation for even the best people is usually 85% base salary.


How is that possible? example please


Total compensation is base salary plus stock/options. If your stock grant goes down by enough, total compensation may fall even if base salary went up.


I'm actually a stock trader, so it's even more skewed for me and would be a good example. Let's say I get paid $50 per year. At the end of the year, depending on my/our performance, I will get paid between $0 and $200 as a bonus, which I wouldn't count as part of my base comp.

Other forms of non-base include stocks/options/etc.


Performance bonuses?


I think many ask you to take a hit. If you relocated to SF, you would expect your compensation to go up, wouldn't you?

Fun calculator for relocations:

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=compare+salary+of+100,...


Like most of these things, this calculator makes some broad assumptions.

For instance, it assumes transportation costs in Manhattan are higher than most other places. This is unbelievably inaccurate in my experience. Maybe it assumes people here take taxis all over the place? I've found transportation to be cheaper in NYC than anywhere else in the USA. No car or gasoline or insurance or maintenance, etc. A car costs on average about 9k/year to own according to AAA. In a place like NYC if you take the Subway every day your cost is about 1,300/year. Throw in a few hundred for cabs and you're looking at 1,800/year. It doesn't cover the rent gap compared to most places but it helps.

In effect this calculator says a salary in Chicago goes nearly twice as far (so if you make 200k in NYC that would be 106k in Chicago. In my experience that is simply untrue. 200k in NYC would be closer to 170k in Chicago.

I think this calculator is making the assumption someone would require the same resources, like a car in all places. Or that someone who had 1600 square feet of living space would expect the same in NYC, which would be ridiculous. No reasonable person would assume they would move to NYC and get a car and garage it. That simply isn't the typical lifestyle here. Most my friends born and raised in the city don't even have licenses.

It also claims that living in San Francisco is significantly cheaper than NYC which is untrue as well.


I also find it frustrating that this [and similar tools] don't break down by something more granular, such as neighborhood or zip code.

For example, it's not exactly sound to average the price of all neighborhoods in Manhattan.


COL indexes are flawed? Who knew.

I hope it would be apparent you should reference many different sources when comparing salaries in different locations.


I moved to Chicago from SF and took a substantial hit. But I was doing a lateral move and am still early in a career change. If you are moving to a higher position or you have lot of experience you may carry better across geos. Like a guy I know is long time marketer and got wined and dined by 20ish startups in Chicago. Im sure he did fine on salary.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: