Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"There are two sides to this story."

I completely agree. There's probably many (more than two) sides to the story. I was just clarifying what I thought to be a misunderstanding of a comment. (I did say "I think his point was not X but Y"). I wasn't endorsing his position.

I personally have no interest in wasting time, neurons and keystrokes passing judgment on what level of "punishment" (including naming/outing) for this person would be appropriate, especially here on HN. (Nothing wrong in wanting to, just saying I don't want to).

Most penal codes I know (IANAL) do take age and frequency of crime into account before deciding what punishment is appropriate. I suspect, if taken to court, he would get away with a slap on the wrist.

Frankly I could care less. As I said, I am neutral on this with a very slight bias to "he's been punished enough".



The thing is that there is a more or less guaranteed discussion of your stuff on HN if it gets posted on TC, and vaksel has more than done his bit to promote TC on HN, so I can really understand he feels taken in a bad way. Another option is that vaksel was refused a write-up by that person, in which case I really understand why he's mad.

As for the frequency being a factor, yes but only after it turns out that TC has posted guidelines.

If not then you can basically discount whatever TC writes about anything from now on.

All I read is that Mike got contacted by someone that was approached, but that if that had not happened this could have been going on (and may have gone on) for a long time.

And that's pretty bad.


" and vaksel has more than done his bit to promote TC on HN, so I can really understand he feels taken in a bad way."

Interesting. I wasn't aware of vaksel's TC promotion here. I can (now) see why he felt as he did.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: