This sounds wrong, given that "end-to-end encryption" as a concept is very much production ready.
Proper capitalization would help; Google choosing a less overloaded name in the first place would have helped more.
We're going to have a very hard time talking about end-to-end crypto to consumers without at least one person confusing this with googles addon. (Thanks google)
This sounds wrong, given that "end-to-end encryption" as a concept is very much production ready.