Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | wat10000's commentslogin

It’s software.

The industry is usually smarter than this.

For example, there are many pieces of equipment that can be broken and they’ll still fly, because it’s not essential or there’s enough redundancy.

Child safety seats are not required even though they’d save lives, because the extra hassle and expense would cause some parents to drive instead, which is much more dangerous, leading to more overall deaths.

Normally the decisions are quite sensible. But the moment any “terrorism” enters the picture it all goes out the window.


All of those have the luxury of risk evaluation in advance

Refused, or unable? It might have been in the luggage compartment, or they just might not have known how.

Could also have been a prank played on somebody who wasn't even aware

This presupposes knowing that a fitbit uses bluetooth. As I understand it, there are also models (e.g. Fitbit Charge) which cannot be turned off anyway.

Plus there is an overall assumption here that the owner of a Fitbit knows that the device nickname is visible to anyone, and not just themselves.

These things are certainly not at all obvious in an app-centric bluetooth device context.


I don’t buy it.

I understand protecting people’s sensibilities by avoiding these words. That part makes sense. Same basic politeness as not using curse words in my variable names.

But to turn an entire flight around because of a Bluetooth device name? How does that make any rational sense?

Look at it from a Bayesian perspective. There’s some probability P that there’s a bomb on a random plane. Now, given that a specific plane has a Bluetooth device named “bomb,” what is P for that specific plane?

I argue that P is unchanged. I’d be interested if anyone disagrees with this assessment.

Given the probability is unchanged, why do anything?

I don’t think even the people involved believed there was any danger. They had closer airports they could have diverted to. Going all the way back to Newark makes no sense if you actually think there’s an increased chance there’s a bomb on the plane that might detonate at any time, or a hijacker who might decide to make an attempt, or any other threat.

Going back to the origin airport instead of a closer one is what you do when there’s some mundane problem like the weather being unsuitable at the destination, or a non-critical equipment failure.

So how does this make any rational sense? It doesn’t. It’s performance. Everyone wants to be seen Taking Things Seriously. Nobody is permitted (either explicitly by rules, or implicitly by social expectations) to say “somebody is being a real jerk, but there’s no point in diverting.”


It was not only because of the name. I think a big part of the turn around was the non compliance by the passengers. They were asked to turn off all Bluetooth devices but did not.

The device was probably in checked baggage. Or in an overhead compartment where the owner would have been seen and socially ostracized for removing it.

It was a fitness wristband. The kid probably didn't even know it used Bluetooth.

Your US figures are using average pay for the whole country but cost of living for one of the most expensive parts of it.

Also add that the German figures don't have student loans, while the US has a monthly cost for them.

Now that may be fair, but anyone looking to move either has or doesn't have student loans and that won't change.


From the point of view of the people who would actually do it, the most important effect of impeaching Trump would be a messy political fight and likely losing reelection in November. The most important effect of not impeaching him is they get to stay in office. Everything else is unimportant by comparison.

It's very likely that you have multiple SQLite databases in your pocket right now. It's one of the most widely deployed pieces of software on the planet. If your conclusion is that it's guaranteed to cause more problems than other solutions, then that's on you.

Correct! I'm not "worried" about it, I've been putting SQLites in your and my pocket for the last 17 years.

I don't want to be glib and leave it there, even though I'm slightly annoyed you missed several sigils in my post that I was well past that.

The point is, for the not in your pocket case, for the not a singular document store case, I'm curious what the use case is.


I use it to keep infra spend low for some systems I built/maintain for a handful of volunteer orgs. These systems have multiple users, dozens to a couple hundred. I just serialize writes in app code. Backup the db files to blob storage every so often and don't think about it much more.

Now you've added a substantial dependency, and annoying setup requirements. Good luck doing this for a native app on mobile or desktop.

If someone is talking about "spinning up a separate machine" for Postgres, they're not talking about a desktop or mobile app...

Obviously SQLite is the best choice for a mobile or desktop app, that's not what's being discussed here.

Someone with experience would know that concurrency isn't a universal requirement.

Almost everything, and that's already three generations behind.

I don't really need USB-C displays or Thunderbolt for my use case. The touch ID is easily replaced with a Yubikey.

Everything else just works. What is the problem?


Sounds great for you! What about everyone else?

Many people prefer to get new devices so that they can be covered by Apple Care. That completely removes Linux as an option because Asahi Linux never supports any of the recent models.


Many people don't care about Linux support in the first place. Generally these two groups are overlapping.

"Buy this computer, it's several generations behind and a bunch of stuff doesn't work" is not a ringing endorsement, even if it does work well enough for you.

I still do all my work on an M1 MBP ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

That’s wonderful for you and apple.

What does Apple gain from this scenario?

Just to add, I also do my work from an M1 MacBook that I crammed Asahi onto. I got it used for a few hundred dollars last year and it's a perfectly fine experience (for me).


Same. If not for the required hardware refresh in our company I would have used it until it broke.

USB display support was demoed at a conference at the end of last year.

We’re already almost halfway through this year. A demo half a year ago isn’t shipped. This is like when Apple demos something at WWDC that doesn’t ship until 9 months later in spring the following year.

A patch set landed shortly there after.

https://asahilinux.org/2026/02/progress-report-6-19/


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: