Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ranyume's commentslogin

The CCP would never dream of giving the state's control to tech CEOs.

You just need to think outside the box: the CCP is big tech, not Congress. The CCP (big tech in the analogy) would never dream of giving control to congress.

What does outcompete economically mean and why would it matter? Or do you mean society A dominates in some form society B? This has already happened in history and is the essence of capitalism. If you want to overcome this situation you need to replace capitalism globally.


> If you want to overcome this situation you need to replace capitalism globally.

Not true.. you just need to replace late-stage capitalism locally. There's a very reasonable concept of circular economy that's relevant here. It breaks down only in that sometimes you need things that you can't make and must go outside the circle. Especially if you intentionally work to mitigate the main stuff requiring you to go outside, it's not some law of nature that it must continue, or even a law of capitalism. Some protectionism / local-first is part of it, but the bigger part is just being rational.

The bad kind of globalism, enshittification, dead-economy theory, and basically ALL of the really ugly stuff we could talk about here are characteristic of late-stage capitalism and the associated short-term thinking, and it's totally consistent for a real capitalist to reject it. Why? Because getting as rich as possible isn't incompatible with sustainability.. particularly from the perspective of corporations/countries that plan to last longer than a single human CEO or exist beyond a single generation of shareholders/citizens.


Unfortunately the only language elites know is violence.


What do you mean? You just need to ban companies from doing 5 days work.


Amusingly, there is literally not even a 7 day work week ban for companies in the US. You can require employees work every day. Employers are just required to pay employees overtime under various conditions beyond 40 hours / five days a week, which is why you don't see it.

And what's more, software engineers are exempt from these rules because of their pay grades. If you're a SWE making a salary the odds are your employer could require you work on Saturdays without running afowl of labor laws.

This is all powered by norms.


it's not powered by norms. In the US, if you want to employ someone more than 40 hours you have to give them extra overtime pay. It's called the Fair Labor Standards Act and it was passed in 1938


Unless you are exempt. Guess what profession tends to be considered exempt?

If you are a SWE, you don't get paid overtime for working that incident on the weekend or going over 40 hours in a week. The only reason you work five days a week is tradition.


Hence the rise of 996 bs


It's easy to get around that; just switch your employees to a salaried arrangement, and now you're exempt from shelling out for overtime pay.

Give the employees enough work such that they have to work on weekends... and... done.


"Yeah, hello, Peter. What's happening? Listen, um, I'm going to need you to go ahead and come in on Saturday. So, if you could be here around 9, that would be great. Mmhkay? Oh, oh, and I almost forgot. I'm also going to need you to go ahead and come in on Sunday too."


You would also need to ban them from employing people in other countries that allow 5 days work.


Same logic applies internationally.


Pretty much everywhere outside the US has stronger employee protections on this (with a few obvious notable exceptions).

France is a great place to be an employee.


Expropriating value is not.


>Their descendants

I'm sad to tell you, they're already looking for places on earth to buy land to build their nest after they decimate or help decimate humanity.


Let's not confuse things. One thing is lives lost at a war, another thing is lives lost at a genocide.


One is victim if genocide. Other us someone who attempted genocide and was stopped by force.


This isn’t a written by a human — it's a AI-accelerated piece.


In science there are ways to surface subjectivity (cannot be counted) into observable quantized phenomena. Take opinion polls for instance: "approval" of a political figure can mean many things and is subjective, but experts in the field make "approval" into a number through scientific methods. These methods are just an approximation and have many IFs, they're not perfect (and for presidential campaign analysis in particular they've been failing for reasons I won't clarify here), but they're useful nonetheless.

Another thing that get quantized is video preferences to maximize engagement.


This is an interesting update. And a big challenge for companies and labs. The new tools for measurement are indeed what I'd like out of future agents, and agents that solve the games will need to use different subsystems to do so. This is basically optimization for achieving goals (as opposed to prompt engineering / magic spells to make the LLM do what is told to do) which imo is the future we should aspire to build.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: