Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | psim1's commentslogin

I think I would have instead changed the name to `marty`, who, in time, learned to think fourth-dimensionally.

Maybe. But it's longer and already taken on crates.io.

I like the ideas of this article but would not use SPARC as a main badguy in my examples. A naive and probably popular takeaway would be, "Thank goodness I am not writing for SPARC and don't need to worry about these SPARC architectural concerns!"

I went through elementary and middle school using MECC software on Apple II, and of course had no idea at the time what a treasure it was. My generation was at the beginning of the computer-education revolution; we had "gamified" learning before that was ever a thing.

An Apple II on a wheeled desk-cart was always popular in elementary school.


Truly, the SE was a great phone. It was not really "rolled in" to future phone models; it just ended.


I don't know your definition of "rolled in", but the actual successor to the SE is the e line (iPhone 16e, 17e, etc).

I agree that the SE was a great iPhone and a great form factor. I didn't have one, but my kid did. Whenever I had to do something on their SE, I found it so much more usable than my own whatever Pro phone of that time. It wasn't enough to get me to go to an SE, however.


Tangentially related, if anyone has Sun nostalgia but only a bit, find a Sun Type 6 USB keyboard on eBay and plug it in. Great keyboard for a Mac. Unfortunately, the left-hand function keys (Stop, Again, Props, etc.) do not emit any usable keycodes. But everything else works.


Definitely not the grandson of Microsoft Bob.


I hate EVERYTHING about this generic looking product. But I think they're probably referencing... Bob the Builder [1]? Maybe?

Say what you will about Microsoft Bob - that one at least had a soul even if it was twisted and dark.

Sigh. Remember when IBM did neat stuff like Deep Blue and Watson?

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_the_Builder


I agree, it looks like an IBM-mediocre version of every other LLM coding tool that currently exists.


(Please don't downvote - serious question) Are Chinese models generally accepted for use within US companies? The company I work for won't allow Qwen.


There is a difference between Chinese model and Chinese service.

Your company most likely is banning the use of foreign services, but it wouldn't make sense to ban the model, since the model would be ran locally.

I wouldn't allow my employees to use a foreign service either if my company had specific geographic laws it had to follow (ie, fin or med or privacy laws, such as the ones in the EU).

That said, I'm not sure I'd allow them to use any AI product either, locally inferred on-prem or not: I need my employees to _not_ make mistakes, not automate mistake making.


In private sector yes. Anything that touches public sector (government) and it starts to be supply chain concerns and they want all american made models


The only problem is that the American models are super fracking dumb. Arcee Thinking Large (398B) is orders of magnitude worse than even Qwen 3.5 35B, getting stuck in thinking loops with incredibly basic questions that Google could answer in 500ms.


LibreOffice almost seemed irrelevant; with cheap to free (*included) tools in abundance, such as MS Office, Google Workspace, Apple Pages/Numbers/Keynote, the need for LibreOffice is not what it once was, back when StarOffice and OpenOffice were liberating people from the tyranny of Microsoft.

Now it's worse than irrelevant, it's a liability.


It's still the only free as in freedom office suite option I'm aware of. I do try my best to avoid needing such software at all (I prefer to stay inside vim), but it has its uses when dealing with files from other people, or niche stuff like importing XML and saving as a CSV.


For what it’s worth, AbiWord and Gnumeric are still around (but are of course much less capable).


Gnumeric is great. It's the only one that holds up with massive CSV files and remains snappy. So I tend to prefer it. Functions are more limited than Calc though.


About 10 years ago the Ubuntu package manager borked my installation of LibreOffice (or maybe it was OpenOffice then). I only used it for spreadsheets and Gnumeric was able to open the ODS files just fine. There was only one function that I need to change (DaysInYear for handling leap years).

If for any reason I have to go back to it, I think I can.


For context, you cannot export a Google Doc in its native format and import the file later from another account.

That’s the price you pay: Google owns your data. You’ve sold your soul to them.


None of the tools that you mentioned except for LibreOffice and OpenOffice are free-as-in-freedom, and if you’re using Linux on the desktop, then Microsoft Office and the Apple iWork suite are unavailable as desktop applications.


Some of us run unGoogled/M$ Linux systems and want offline functionality. None of those options you mentioned would work for us.


MS office has never been cheap or included


I guess you don’t remember a time when spreadsheets sold for $495 a seat. And that was just the spreadsheet. IIRC, Excel 1.0 retailed for $99.


One source[1] says the first release of Excel (for the Mac, in 1985) had a price of $395, or about $1,200 in inflation-adjusted 2026 dollars.

[1]: https://archive.org/details/history-of-PC


Forced +$30 per seat per month to get people loaded into their proprietary AI


It's $8.30/month. It's cheaper than Netflix and Amazon Prime.


Over 50 years' time that's $4980.


50 years ago you needed about 5 million bucks to get started with electronic spreadsheets on your IBM mainframe


For three or four endpoints all within the home, you could do this with just ATAs and not even need a SIP server. Many ATAs have a configurable "dial plan" that will let you map a number to an IP address, thus giving you the ability to call the other terminals directly within the LAN.


Do you have an ATA you like? They are all janky in different ways in my experience.


Janky is directly proportional to cost. Grandstream are the jankiest and least expensive. I like the Cisco 191; it is a fine unit but costs about $100-120.


Yeah, this was the confirmation I needed that it's "not just me."


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: