Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ortusdux's commentslogin


Marques Brownlee toured one recently - "Ferrari Luce is the Most Controversial Ferrari Ever"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Reu1WS3BhM


Thanks for the link. Totally seeing the appeal of this car.

The UX seems actually very good (based on this short review so far). Good use of physical tactile controls + flexibility of a screen.

As to external looks. Whenever I see old ICE sports cars (all those lotuses, ferraris, lamborghinis) they seem so awkward and out of place on city streets. They just scream midlife crisis. I think this will be an upgrade in that sense.


Yeah but why would anyone pay $600k for a car just to not look like they are having a midlife crisis?

Some people exist in another financial dimension :shrug: Bentleys and rolls royces for example don't scream midlife crisis and this is a bit closer to that by comfort apparently

Its UI looks amazing. Of course, I have no clue about its IRL UX.

I have a clue about IRL UX of touchscreen only car interfaces and they suck...

Seeed studio has a module if you want to make your own - https://www.seeedstudio.com/Embedded-Thermal-Printer-p-1621....

Most of the alternatives today (including the Costco receipt in my pocket) are labeled "phenol free". As I understand it they use vitamin c or a urea derived compound.

Whoa! Really? That’s cool! Thanks!

Yep! WA State is the first to ban retailers from using phenol paper starting this year. I'd imagine hobbyists buying thermal printers online are likely to end up with the bad stuff, so I think it's good for people to be aware of the issue and the fact that there are cheap alternatives.

I really appreciate that you mentioned this, I am now very inspired to do a fun thermal printer project with my kids. Thank you!

Many states already ban the private collection of license plate data.

Which states are those? I'd like to read the statutes.

https://www.ncsl.org/technology-and-communication/automated-...

A friend entertained the idea of a startup focused on a social dashcam site, where users can upload clips of bad drivers tagged with their license plate number, and smart dashcams can alert to bad drivers in real time. They got as far as asking a lawyer before it fell apart.


Yikes. This smells a bit like Stasi-style surveillance. Unofficially encouraged by authorities. Rewards or social pressure or ideology turned a significant % of East Germans into Inoffizieller Mitarbeiters ("unofficial collaborators" or informants). Bad drivers today. And then ...

The point of the stasi collaborators was to undermine the targets personal relationships and isolate them because of the fear that they might be an informant.

Publicly posting the behavior or unaffiliated parties is nothing like the stasi.


Regardless of the official point of Stasi collaborators, what they did was contribute to millions of government surveillance files on fellow citizens. The similarity to a social network of public surveillance is the unpaid, unvetted, untrained manner, of collection with questionable motivation, be it social or political or simply anger.

Interestingly, the contributors may also be profiling themselves as able to and willing to surveil fellow citizens, should the opportunity arise.


The stasi had millions of files and no technical way to search them efficiently.

Random unpaid members of the public posting the most outrageous behavior they see is not a surveillance state. The chance that any one incident will be recorded is low.


I'm glad they did the research on this lol I thought about this a decade ago when I was doing a lot of driving and always thought it'd be something I'd explore. Good to know it's against the law

There's a nice list here with references to statutes: https://www.ncsl.org/technology-and-communication/automated-...

Just so we're clear, across all these statutes, the term "private" means "for private use". State and local governments can engage private firms to collect data in all of them.

I wonder how this figures in with states that don't permit any ALPR use by non-law enforcement. Presumably in those localities private entities can't collect ALPR data on behalf of law enforcement.

This page has some more background (and the most amusing map legend I've seen in awhile):

https://repo.buzz/lpr/alpr-legality-for-all-50-states/


I did not know that. I do wish I lived in one.

One just needs to store personal data on license plates then. Handy.


It's the free square on the bingo card


I could see this image in my mind before I clicked on it, before even consciously considering what it might be. Is this how an LLM feels on the inside?

It was the image in my mind when I made the bingo joke. Maybe we are living in a simulation.

There are some commercially available home security systems that use a version of this tech. - https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/wifi-sensing-motion-detection...

As a homeowner, the idea of knowing the exact number of people on my property at any time is attractive. Heck, I'm pricing out a new fence to keep deer out, and it would be much cheaper to just have a system that turns the sprinklers on whenever one is detected.

But the ethical implications are wild. Unless I'm mistaken, someone could use this link today to track the activities of the couple in the apartment next door, and they would have no way to know it is happening.


Reminds me of South Lake Union Transit, though they did not embrace the moniker.


South Lake Union Trolley.

You can get t-shirts.


Reminds me of the managers that use 'lines of code added' as a metric


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: