Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | david_shi's commentslogin

Can't wait for the movie about this to come out.

The first assumption has been long disproved since multiple full scale Discord data leaks. If it's a public server, it can be scraped.

https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2024/04/billions-of-s...


Very cool. Have you checked out some of the other networks?


It seems like this is designed for atomic purchases, could it be extended for subscriptions?


Hey, I'm one of the developers at Tempo. We're working on an extension type for subscriptions to propose being added to the spec as well! We're starting with the simple types, but subscriptions are a natural extension. The subscription intent will work similarly to a one-time charge—the server returns a 402 with intent="subscription", and the client signs a recurring authorization.


Cool, would be nice to get specifics on how payments are processed, failures, and cancellations re: the recurring model.


> MPP provides a specification for agents and services to coordinate payments programmatically, enabling microtransactions, *recurring payments*, and more.


https://docs.stripe.com/payments/machine/mpp

Yeah I read that copy too, did you read the spec?


I believe the Shared Payment Token is interchangeable with a payment method id that you attach to a customer object, but that link has very sparse information about how things actually work end to end and what objects mean what.


Yeah for sure, I'll add a caveat for public facing skills in production.

Mostly interested in gotchas and efficiency improvements learned in shipping those to multiple harnesses, etc.


S -> Z?



not knocking this specific implementation in any way, but it's crazy that live OSINT dashboards are now the demo project of choice vs. todo apps


Integrate the two and you have a global to-do dashboard fit for any wannabe world dominator.


aggregating API data sources + visual display of data - honestly seems a good fit for a demo project.


Where else would you go?


At some point, the contradiction of "law as something impartial" and "law bends to the whims of power" will need to be resolved.


Bad news, it's already been resolved.


Wholly agreed.

The way Disney &co coopted law to pack their coffers is a travesty: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Term_Extension_Act


>the contradiction of "law as something impartial" and "law bends to the whims of power" will need to be resolved

human nature will not change. the best change folks here could make is accepting that.


Everything bends to power, by definition. And laws can’t be impartial because they’re not based in hard science: terms like “murder”, “assault”, “theft”, etc. are ambiguous thus up to interpretation (e.g. is a scam theft? If so, what defines a scam? If “lying”, what’s the difference from “misleading”, or if there’s no difference, what defines “misleading”…)

My best idea for a solution is better education, so people don’t make bad laws then badly enforce them.


Right problem, wrong solution. You can't build something that doesn't bend to power, by definition. You have to take away the power.


Power can only be redistributed.

Education also bends to power (people can be “educated” via propaganda), but it’s harder because people have some level of critical thinking. You can only chain so many lies before they contradict each other or live experience.


"the law" has always only been the whims of the powerful aa a threat of violence against the powerless if they don't follow


The nukes will fall before they give up power.


If everyone had this attitude we'd still be dying of tuberculosis and countless other diseases.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: