Apple's dream... that if the contempt can't be unwound so they can obstruct third party payments with a 27% fee, then every developer wanting to use third party payments should have to sue them individually - a process they will make sure takes years and hemorrhages vast amounts of money while they delay, stall discovery, abuse document privilege, lie to judges, and evade compliance... all over again.
Even their Supreme Court appeal is dishonest, both the judge and the appeals court found they violated the "letter" of the injunction while Apple claims they're being punished for violating the "spirit" of it.
Can you cite this? It's not YAML execution syntax, surely Github doesn't do it, the only vector I can see is if you put it unquoted into a shell script inside of a GHA yaml.
All you need is user content containing `backticked`, and a github action referencing that via eg "github.event.issue.title" where the shell would normally execute `backticked` as a command (like echo, cat, etc).
Because software is a massive house of cards and its bottom layers are poorly-funded people and volunteer groups who can't conceive every possible security issue, don't necessarily engage in every best practice to secure their accounts and publishing pipelines, can't single-handedly provide adequate oversight of all their dependencies, and might fall prey to a targeted attack or tempting offer.
And then on top of that are companies building software and prioritizing new features over revisiting old code.
But they make way more money implementing the dark pattern playbook. It's hardly an accident when subscriptions are hard to cancel it's a deliberate optimization.
> In the fire, 384 battery packs were burnt, which took down 96 government systems. Whilst this is obviously still a huge loss, 95 of these had backups - but the G-drive system (government drive), used primarily by the Ministry of Personnel Management, did not.
> [...] reports estimate that 8 years worth of data was lost, and around 17% of central government officials are impacted
Being against on-prem just because South Korean government implemented on-prem poorly with no backup best practices and lost data one time, would be like if homo sapiens stopped using fire because a guy burned down his straw hut one time.
Yes but you're saying this guy needs to build his own house and trusting him to obey the fire and safety codes, when plenty of professionals exist that specialize in following those.
reply