Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | SenpaiSilver's commentslogin

I still hate that turning off one of my monitors moves the windows to the other still on monitor...


Funny, on my gaming windows computer I turn off my OLED monitor BEFORE I turn off the computer to let it do its special processing reliably. I’ve had the opposite issue to yours, several windows will remain on the turned off monitor! I have that one on HDMI and the second monitor on a DP connection.


HDMI monitors don't report being disconnected when turned off.


Well that explains it! Maybe I should switch my main to DP and my backup to HDMI.


...that seems like a really good and intuitive feature. What would expect it to do instead? Close the window? Keep it on some invisible virtual desktop? (how large is the mysterious off-screen area in which windows can be lost?)


My laptop has a 15" 1080p panel. It's attached to 2x 32" 4K panels. When I'm done for the day, I turn the screens off.

When I come back the next day, all my windows are on the laptop onboard display, and if I'm lucky, resized in a way that makes them movable. If I'm unlucky, I need to close the application, re-open it, and hope it's back in a helpful way.

The 2x 4K panels show me my wallpaper every morning. They don't show me any windows that were on them.

"intuitive" is in the eye of the beholder.


For anyone else who gets stuck with a window where the draggable part is off-screen on Windows, if you click the icon in the taskbar to "focus" the window, hold Win+Shift and hit the up arrow, it'll maximize the window so you can see the controls. If it's on a different monitor, or on a "ghost" monitor your computer thinks is plugged in but isn't actually, use Win+Shift and left/right arrow keys until you can see the window :)

Still a very stupid problem to have to solve.


https://www.elevenforum.com/t/enable-or-disable-remember-win...

You can ask Windows to try and remember the location. It's not fool proof, but it works 90% of the time.

In fact, I've got more issues with windows opening on a non-connected screen (and then having to do Winkey + right a couple of times until it shows up on my laptop screen.


Suspend the machine instead? The external monitors will go to sleep when they lose the signal.

I don't know how you expect that machine to know that you're only disabling that monitor temporarily and you expect it to restore your windows at some future time when it reconnects.

If you plug in a new monitor, should windows jump onto it spontaneously?


I do the same, either my Dock, my Laptop or my screens, or all together give some weird issues where the screens turn on every 5 minutes and go to sleep.

And searching for 'Dock screen wakes up during sleep' just floods <search engine> with 'screen does not wake up after sleep'. And with <search engine>'s removal of respecting + and -, I am not sure I'll ever find a solution...


For what its worth Windows should handle this well enough now. Window locations are restored when the monitor setup returns to a previous layout.


My up-to-date patched install of Windows 10 does not, unfortunately


My macos does :D


I expect the same behavior as HDMI, VGA and DVI: the windows stay until the screen is physically disconnected.


anyone know if theres a way to fix this?


I'd start with the question: where do you want them to go? Windowing systems generally don't have a 'limbo' where windows can live without being displayable, and that probably isn't what you want, either.

Do you want them all to auto-minimize? You can probably get that. But it starts with answering the question.


I could imagine a tiling window manager like sway having a "temporarily gone" pseudo-workspace that holds windows that were on another monitor until you plug it back in or pull them to another workspace. Or to remember that workspaces 1, 3, and 5 were on another monitor recently, and to put them back there when you plug back in.


Sway does the latter. When you have multiple displays, every workspace gets assigned to a display. When you remove a display, those workspaces move onto a remaining display, but, importantly, every window stays on the workspace it was on, so you don't get shuffling and rearranging windows. When you plug that display back in, those workspaces go back to that display. I get that there's no "perfect" way to handle this situation, but the way Sway does it is so much more simple and predictable than Gnome or Windows.


If it's the same problem I've had, I feel the pain!

On a laptop, reconfiguring to use monitors as and when you connect/disconnect them can be great.

However, I'm often on a PC with a fixed multi-monitor setup. The situation where one monitor is briefly out is transient. But some windowing systems decide to permanently erase all your painfully eked out settings at the drop of a hat.

The correct behavior in this particular case is actually just to do nothing, the fact that a monitor seems to have gone away should just be ignored. (Because it didn't go away, really. Maybe I'm just messing with it for a sec, or it's a different brand and turns on/off a few seconds after the others)

[IIRC on KDE you can prevent auto-reconfiguration by turning Kscreen OFF ]


Dual monitor KVM with EDID emulation. Cheap with HDMI. Still pricey for the few DP switches out there that support it.


Or even cheaper, there are little HDMI EDID emulation dongles. That said, you end up with windows staying on unreachable displays, so it's not always the best solution.


I also really dislike this moving of windows when a display is powered off.

That's why I run fluxbox window manager on a non-ubuntu linux distibution.

Leave windoze, leave ubuntu, regain control of your computer...


How is the TPM protecting my if my laptop with the TPM chip is stolen?

I understand that I will be protected from removing the HDD/SSD and putting it into another machine to read the data, but does it really protect me from anything else?


What other protections might you expect it to provide?

Being unable to retrieve the data on protected drives (which could include cookies, passwords, ID, photos/videos, etc.) is the value.


Preventing your storage from being put in another device is what it's meant to be protecting you against. If it's still in the original device then an attacker is still blocked by your login password.


Was it ever proven to be true/fake? This is the one I think: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17115643


If the gmail address linked as the recovery address for the first gsuite admin on a domain is suspended for a T&C violation, then the whole gsuite domain will be suspended too automatically.

Its a good reason to never link a gmail address as a recovery address for gsuite - always use another free mail provider.


For people who have already made that mistake, would switching the recovery address fix it, or is it unfixable?

Also, what if the recovery address is another g suite account in a separate domain?


Would normal users personnal accounts be suspended if set as recovery for their normal work GSuite account if the GSuite admin is suspended?

I personally never link or login with my personnal accounts on work devices, nor do I use work accounts on personal devices.


I don't think so.

T&C violations disable an account and any linked recovery addresses (and accounts with the same recovery phone number).

If an account is disabled, all resources associated are disabled and deleted 30 days later.

A GSuite domain is considered a resource 'owned' by the first admin, so if that account is disabled, so are all in the domain. If it is deleted, so is the domain.


CCleaner isn't bundle with Windows so you could choose to not install it. It's not really needed anyway.


But you cannot really opt out from Windows telemetry.


You still have more configuration knobs than on Google's OSes.


What does Android/ChromeOS have to do with this? Mac OS X is the most comparable and it lets you disable reporting on first setup (not buried deep within one of two different control panels).

And if you really wanted to compare it to Android/ChromeOS, consider that Windows is still $120-200 for a license and still silently tracks out of the box. That just doesn't seem right. How much more do I need to pay to turn off being tracked?


The Windows licenses only matter when buying a Windows DVD without computer, they barely reflect on the whole computer price.

In fact in some stores that sell computers with FreeDos or Linux, the models tend to be more expensive than those with Windows.

ChromeOS by being a browser based OS, means all applications run in someone else's computer, no way to turn tracking off other than not using ChromeOS at all.

Likewise, what each Android model allows to turn off and what gets tracked depends pretty much on how each OEM has customized their Android version.


My take on this is that it's not aimed at coding but more like a way to map ideas.


At least we can set "UseCanonicalName" to "On" on the virtual host in the meantime.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: