Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | JacobLinney's commentslogin

I believe this is just due to how they're parsing the README.md on https://github.com/casey/just. (Though this should probably still be updated)

The installation section has no direct body, but there are subheaders with the actual instructions.

Ex. https://just.systems/man/en/chapter_3.html


Lichess on chrome let's me use however many logical processors I have. For whatever reason I can only get a single thread on Firefox.

I'm not sure why either, because a while back I could use how ever many threads I wanted on Firefox.


For me it's:

Chrome: 15 threads, 1 GB memory

Firefox: 1 thread, 256 MB

Brave: 2 threads, 128 MB


What a puzzle. I have:

Firefox: 7 threads, 256 MB

Brave: 3 threads, 1 GB


  Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba (MB), Canada
  Remote: Yes
  Willing to relocate: No
  Technologies: Python, Docker, Kubernetes (K8s), FastAPI, PostgreSQL, SQLite, Typescript, React, git, Linux, 
  Résumé/CV: On request, please email me
  Email: jacob@linney.dev


I'm curious why, what does face unlock do for you that fingerprint doesn't?

If I'm unlocking my phone, I have my hands on my phone, so using my fingerprint isn't a hassle. Plus with COVID and needing to wear masks, I can still unlock my phone easily without needing to pull down my mask.


I got sweaty hands and that doesn't work with TouchID. FaceID has been great, well at least until COVID. I'd really prefer both.


Similar situation for me (but I have dry hands).

Fingerprint sensors stop recognizing after about a week - so I prefer Face Unlock.


search bar != run dialogue


The channel name is the same as the github username of the deno db author, so I think it is actually related despite the content not seeming to be

Edit: And the authors website links to this channel


Same person. Their GitHub profile is linked from the above Deno repo, and their website is linked from their GitHub page, and that in turn links the Youtube channel, in addition to the obvious common user name.


Yes it is irrational. That's a common statistical misconception, the key thing here is that every flip has a 60% chance of being heads.

The result of each flip is completely independent of what came before it. In your example the 7th flip is just as likely to be heads as the first flip, or any of the other 5 flips that landed on heads.


It says "a coin that would land heads 60% of the time". If it's already landed heads 60% of the time, I'd expect the remaining 40% for it to land on tails.


Thought experiment: in what way has it landed heads 60% of the time? It landed heads 100% of the trials so far, but the coin has no way of keeping track of that.


That's not a guarantee for any number of flips. For example, if you only flipped the coin one time, what does "60% of the time" even mean in that context? As your other replies have indicated, this is getting at the long-run frequency, meaning as you flip the coin more and more times, approaching infinity, the number of heads approaches 60%.


The key here is that it's expected to land heads 60% of the time. Take a normal coin, which is expected to land heads 50% of the time. If you flip a heads, do you instantly expect it to be tails next time? By your logic it would be impossible to ever flip heads twice in a row. Coins as a general rule aren't impacted by previous flips.


I'm curious what you mean by this, like a service that would handle the encoding?

(Disclaimer: I have no idea what the point of a streaming PC is)


My system primarily revolves around Instapaper[0].

If I run into anything that looks like it might be intereseting I save it to Instapaper using the browser extension on my workstation, or the app on my phone / tablet.

I also have a handful of email lists that automatically forward into instapaper, and a couple rss feeds that auto send to instapaper (Via ifttt[1]).

When I want to actually consume content I use the instapaper iPadOS app, which has a simple and clean UI. (This can also be done in your browser if you prefer)

[0]: https://www.instapaper.com/ [1]: https://ifttt.com/


This works for me on Firefox 75.0


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: