Alternatively, no one sounds like an llm, an llm sounds like someone, typically those close to the median of the training corpus. If AI were genuinly capable of novelty, it would be a big deal, tech bros having enough work ethic to design new detectable prose for an llm is a mssive reach and has no real evidence supporting it, else why do tech bros only tackle the easier issues? Things we have massive well labelled corpi for? Why is it never dishwashing and folding laundry?
I put to you, if you see a trope in AI writing it's because that trope appeared in the training corpus. Therefore, sure, being predjudice against it lets you catch some AI, but you'll also flag human outout. I think that may not be worth it in the end.
Well, they've mostly left reddit as well, afaik. It's a few stragglers, people being paid to push agenda, and auto-moderation now. I was reading / moderating reddit for over 4 hours a day, every day, for close to a decade. Heavy handed pro israeli censorship and propaganda has seen me pick up and leave, as i know many others have done. I was already wavering, over reddit's support of astroturfing and shill bots which were obvious, detectable, and reddit refused to do anything about it. Even actively supported it. So with the whole denying /actively supporting genocide thing, it was time to hang it up and leave.
If wikipedia is shutting off avenues for community input, maybe that is running it's course as well.
Its been nice internet, I loved you, and I will never forgive google for what they put into motion.
I maintian a log of tasks, prompts, related information etc. So i can repeat past workflows verbatim, and I can qualitatively say each model beyond 4.5 has been a regression, and it would not surprise me 4.8 continues the trend. Each iteration has failed at more tasks previously completed succesfully. Right now it flat out refuses to answer many benign chemistry questions, or leans into shilling to hard and ignores non industry funded studies on certain topics. I'm transitioning to deepseek as a reuslt. Cheaper by far and at this stage not strictly speaking less capable.
Your position is that of any normal human. Google is committed to evil however, just look at how playstore notifications are tied to sales spam. Want payment notifivations? Gotta take the ads as well, not seperate toggles, one toggle. Drink liquid shit you tech peasant. Oh? this hostility drove you to f-droid? We'll unilaterally decide every device r belong to us, so we can disable competition we dont approve of. Welcome back to the liquid shit trough, peasant.
AI is like sex. I don't mind it, heck in the right situation I'm quite partial to it. However, if you keep trying to sneak it on me while I sleep, keep trying to slip it into agreements, keep involving people i didnt consent to being involved etc. The whole thing takes on a very ugly vibe. In fact I'm going to grow to be quite hostile toward it. Consent matters, not that I'd expect that lesson to land within silicon valley, second most rapey place in the USA after LA.
I am reading through it, am only at about 20% point so far. It seems AI-generated or at least AI-co-authored. I did not spot "slop" yet, except for one mistake. Do you actually see slop?
Unit word per unit meaning is lower than average human, far lower than average technically capable human, the 'hallucinations'/'mistakes' like you said, overall composition and thoughlessness in visual presentation etc. This is unlikely to have seen a human co-author beyond quick skim/scroll.
If I find myself in a jury panel for someone who took a hammer to these, I already know im voting not guilty, and recommending they get keys to the city.
Should you ever find yourself a juror for such a case, it means you've probably perjured yourself during voir dire, in which case you'd better hope no prosecutor finds out about your biases, or you could be the one who ends up doing time.
While I agree utterly and completely, the possibility of such a case needing a jury is low, when there's almost certainly going to be several camera recordings available from the vehicles in question as well as surrounding buildings/vehicles.
"How would less competition make the world better?" In the context of Umbrella Corp and bayer. Both undoubtedly bad, but one so evil it is irredeemable.
Hmm. I wonder how openAI, in the direction it was taken under Altmans leadership, is a fundamentally and deeply rooted evil thing to allow to exist. It really boggles the brain.
It's like saying "Therapy needs competition, this is why we're allowing PsychoTheRapist to continue practicing, to prevent psychotherapist's from getting to cocky"
Which is odd because the two seem to have fundamentally different purposes with immediate and long-term impacts of the former being unambiguously negative
Besides, strangling OAI in it's cot, as the natural order of things would be, wouldn't get rid of competition. Competition is fierce via Chinese and European offerings.
reply